Who is to blame? Psychoanalysis of the Titans “delight”
Good day, dear readers. Yes, and again yes, I again decided to touch on the topic of underwater anti -utopia and remember my almost the most beloved series of games. The Bioshock Universe has always been attractive and extremely interesting, therefore I will ask you not to judge me strictly, this is most likely the last, cognitive blog from a fan.
The ENT of this game is not amenable to a certain or accurate analysis, as well as its economic, political system. Ken Levin in his interview has repeatedly repeated the idea of the ambiguity of a series of games “Bioshock”. And this is understandable, for the main rod of the entire philosophy of the Universe is held on the theory of objectivism and individualism. All events, all characters, all locations and logic of the world on the one hand gives a certain foundation and immediately destroys it with the consequence. It is impossible to say that the entire trilogy was built, following the initially set plans, and the plot was completely written in places on the go. One has only to recall the first interviews with the developers of “Irrational”, where they noted that they chose the underwater city for the best optimization of the game and the concentration of artistic developments in narrow corridors. Yes, these were the times when game studios thought about optimization and work on it, so that their work did not spoil the weak computer glands of gamers. Further, for this underwater metropolis, the scriptwriters began to write a story, focusing on every little thing. After all, no one would just plunge into the bottom of the sea, the reasons should have been very convincing, and the main logic of the whole and understandable. Ken Levin himself was not even familiar with the work of the famous American writer Ain Rend when he composed the first lines of history. After a while, the studio decided on such a daring step, reflecting very complex thoughts and ideas of several art books in her game. Whether they were able to realize all this? Well, even if even far from anti -utopia and deep, philosophical reasoning, the girl in 2023 tries to tell and rethink the aspects of the game in her noble, then yes. The developers were able to and a piece of their game universe still lives in our hearts.
If you carelessly start the analysis of the Bioshock universe, then the brain can immediately reach the temperature of the white dwarf from contradictions and brutal reality. Moreover, there is no fault of the game itself or people who wrote the main story. The game of topics is beautiful, which clearly shows all these ambiguities and contradictions, in a sense, brutally mocking the source and ideological founder. They built the city of “delight”, came up with a story for it, created characters who became at the origins and, as a result, began to lead them on a logical, consistent alley. And as not surprising, everything came to chaos, decline and total stratification. But how it happened and what led to such an end? Game and tries to answer this question when it gives the opportunity to play for the surviving Jack. The main character and player with him begin to explore all gloomy, but at the same time colorful locations of the city at the bottom of the ocean.
The history of the creation of an underwater city
I am Andrew Ryan, and I came to ask you: doesn’t a person have the right to make it earnings in the sweat of his face?
No, they tell us in Washington. Everything belongs to the poor.
No, they say in the Vatican. Everything belongs to God.
No, they say in Moscow. This belongs to everyone.
I rejected these answers. Instead, I chose something else. I chose the impossible. I chose ..Andrew Ryan
The “delight” was not built immediately and more than one person was engaged in this, it is already clear, but he came up with and created it in a sense one titanium. If there were no such obsessed, conservative magnate Andrew Ryan in the world, then no living soul would have seen the underwater city. Therefore, Ryan’s involvement in this ambitious project will not deny no one will deny. The foundation of “delight” is described in more detail and extremely interesting in the novel by Bioshock from the writer science fiction writer John Shirley. Don’t count it for advertising, rather as a sincere recommendation. The book in all trifles, aspects and nuances explains the system of building the city and its further collapse by the residents themselves.
The city was designed by several talents and very devoted people. Ryan’s welfare allowed him to gather in his office the most intelligent and influential people, who later were also imbued with his ideas and also began this long way into the bright world. At the head were people who later became the most powerful people in the city, in other words, the titans. It was a Billmakdonag, which designed a life support system, pipelines, the Wales brothers who were responsible for the industrial part, Jan Sushong and Steinman were responsible for medicine and science, Sullivan and Carlos ensured safety and order, and of course, Sander Cohen entertained people. There were also people who made a noticeable contribution to the creation of the city, but the main ones were the main. So, the city since the beginning of 1946 began to bloom and smell. Businessmen abandoned their lives on the surface and descended to the city of Ryan to find for themselves a real, comfortable and free place. As Ryan himself said in his winged speeches: “The city in which the artist is not afraid of Censor. Where the scientist does not constrain the Khanzhenskaya morality. Where the great is not limited to small. And if you work in the sweat of your face, delight can become your city too. “.
Ryan kept his promise and for the first time everything went smoothly and sweetly, but the built system began to fail after some time. In an ideal mathematical equation, unnecessary variables appeared that spoiled identity and created parity. There are flaws in every system and “delight” in this regard was no exception. Moreover, he followed the proverb: “The big cabinet falls loudly”, only here it was no longer a closet, but entire skyscrapers built for billions of dollars. And these same flaws and contradictions were created by the people themselves. It is quite logical, people built the city and destroyed it themselves. There was a future of delight in their hands, only now they could not curb him. Is it possible to blame each resident of delight or certain persons is a difficult question, but I will try to answer it.
Next, I want to talk about the most influential and important characters in the Bioshock universe, on which the future of their own utopia depended, as well as psychoanalysis, I will try to prove why they were to blame for all the troubles.
Andrew Ryan
It was not at all impossible to build a “delight” at the bottom of the sea. What was really impossible is to build it somewhere else.
Andrew Ryan
And the founder and main https://www.trsports.co.uk/casino-real-money-games-slots.html figure of “delight” is the first to sit in the psychologist’s chair – Andrew Ryan. Andryusha Ryanovsky is a figure in which you can conduct a fascinating psychoanalysis to better understand its motivation, psychology and influence on the plot of the game. In Bioshok, Andrew Ryan is known as the creator of the underwater city, which is a unique society full of scientific achievements and the ideology of objectivism. He himself is a symbol of this philosophy in the game and personifies the ideas of freedom of personality, capitalism and non -conformism. However, over time, we see how his ideas and ideals begin to collapse. Andrew Ryan is faced with a number of calls that derive him from control, and this leads to a change in his worldview. Gradually, he becomes more and more authoritarian and cruel, trying to maintain his ideology and power. In psychoanalysis, Andrew Ryan can be considered from different points of view. The first thing to consider is his desire to control everything and everything that ultimately leads to his absolute authoritarianism. This can be explained by his fear of loss of power and the loss of his ideals. However, it is also worth paying attention to how Andrew Ryan looks at society. He sees him as mechanistic and greedy, and this affects his worldview. He believes that only the strongest survive and deserve success, which reflects the basic principles of objectivism. His desire for the absolute freedom of the individual and the non -interference of the state in the economy is also characteristic of this philosophy. Nevertheless, his psychological evolution during the game shows that even such strong ideals can be subjected to tests and changes in difficult conditions.
Andrew Ryan is becoming more radical and extreme, and his ideals lose their flexibility. This is understandable, since it proceeds from the situation and is trying to preserve the world that he himself built, and he begins to suppress the forces of other titans. It is not only a key figure in “delight, but also the central element of the plot of the game. His antagonistic actions and the struggle to preserve his ideology create tension and dramatic turns in the game. Its psychological evolution reflects the topic of loss of ideals and making radical decisions. Ryan is a complex character, it is a complex and extremely ambiguous, like the theory of objectivism, a hero, on the basis of which you can write several scientific articles.
Sander Cohen
The artist’s duty is to please the soul and develop thinking.
Sander Cohen
Immediately after the main Atlant of the Underwater Kingdom, a representative of the creative elite goes. I admit honestly, Cohen has always been cute to me, not as a character or anti-Ganist, but rather as a meta-image that clearly shows the terrifying face of the whole world. He is like a joker from the world of art and painting, an artist with great talent and passion for art. But in the world “Bioshock”, an underwater city created by Andrew Ryan, his art has become something more dark and terrible.
Psychoanalysis of Sander Cohen allows us to understand how his psychology reflected on his work and actions, and on the whole environment. Sander Cohen was originally known as a talented artist, but over time his art acquired more abstract and gloomy forms. This can be interpreted as its way to express your mental pain and disappointment. In a past life, Cohen also possessed great successes and almost became one of the Titans of Broadway, along with the most famous artists of the 20th century. His works were attended by a dark and gloomy character, which reflected the painful aspects of the human world, and in “delight” he decided to completely open to the full.
One of the most memorable moments in the game is a meeting with Sander Cohen, where he asks the main character to kill several artists who, in his opinion, are “faked for art”. This demonstrates his absolute obsession with art and his unbending will to control his. This scene shows how his psychology passed into an amorphous and cruel form, not sparing anything and for anyone for his art. Sandra Cohen can also be considered as a metaphor of the dark aspects of the human soul. His work becomes a kind of reflection of the destruction of the Society of the “delight” and the moral decline of its inhabitants. His passion for art can be interpreted as an attempt to find meaning and beauty in a world, which has become crazy and inhuman.
Bridget Tennenbaum
Before Adam’s invention, it was not easier to educate a child than to tame an explosive snake.
Bridget Tennenbaum
The next in line is the great scientist and doctor, Bridget Tennenbaum. This woman plays an important role in the plot and is a key figure when it comes to the use of plasmids and genetic modifications, because she herself is the creator of Adam and all derivatives.
For starters, let’s take a look at childhood and youth Bridget Tennenbaum to understand the roots of her personality. There are no many details in her biography, but it is known that she was a scientist in the field of genetics even before the “delight”, only gloomy stories from the book of John Shirley, which describes complex and immoral trials in the Middle East and China. Most of his life Bridget is experiencing in powerlessness and cruelty. At the same time, the Bridget of the Tennenbaum, like Sushong itself, has exceptional abilities in science and medicine, and the passion for the study of the unknown is rapidly pushing the heroine to the most dubious acts.
One of the brightest features of the Bridget Tennenbaum is its readiness for self -sacrifice. She admits that the creation of plasmids was a terrible mistake, and she tries to correct her actions, helping the main character of the game. This aspect of her personality can be considered in a psychoanalytic context as an attempt to reduce sins and guilt feelings. The very idea of plasmids and genetic modifications can also be psychoanalyzed. Bridget Tennenbaum and her colleagues investigated the boundaries between human and inhuman aspects, and its contribution to the creation of plasmids can be interpreted as an attempt to understand and change human nature and possibilities. Bridget Tennenbaum plays a central role in the plot of the game “Bioshock”. Her personality and motivation emphasize important topics of the game, such as moral dilemmas, self -sacrifice and consequences of scientific research. Her connection with the main character, Jack, also adds depths to the plot and creates an emotional connection with the player.
Sofia Lamb
Evolution is greed and fear formed by cruel pressure of selection. We do not need external devils-first sin in genes.
Sofia Lamb
Sofia Lamb – an outstanding scientist and philosopher. Her intellect and the ability to analyze deep philosophical issues make her unique game in the lore. She began as a doctor in psychology and philosophy and was a fan of the ideology of objectivism. However, her life and worldview began to change after the events that occurred in “delight”.
Over time, Sofia Lamb turned into a radical leader of the movement, and she developed a new philosophy, which she called “Altruism”. She began to convince the inhabitants of “delight” that individualism and freedom of personality are sources of suffering and that collective consciousness and altruism are the path to salvation. This transition in the psychology of Lamb – from individualism to collectivism – is a key moment in its development and determines many aspects of its motivation.
The moral state of Lamb is difficult to evaluate. On the one hand, its goal is to save the inhabitants of “delight” from death and suffering, can be interpreted as altruistic. She claims that she does this to prevent selfish behavior and fights against capitalism and individualism. On the other hand, the methods that it uses, including control over minds and manipulation, are morally dubious and cruel. Her faith in collectivism led to the restriction of personality freedom and the loss of human autonomy.
Her thirst for power and control can be explained by the desire to achieve this goal. The impact on the political situation is difficult to overestimate, since the constant collections of the working class, agitation, frank provocation from Sofia very strongly shook the mood of the “delight”. Two strongest titans began to attack Andrew Ryan on the wonderful world of Andrew Ryan – Sofia Lamb and Frank Fontaine. If the first was an altruism hated by Ryan, collectivism, from which he escaped in childhood, then Frenke Fontaine was a real embodiment of supercapitalism, questioning all his ideals.
Frank Fontaine
These cream of society do not understand one simple thing-they all come here to swim in luxury, but do not realize that there should be someone who will clean the toilers.
Frank Fontaine
Fontaine is a person with an insightful mind, ambitions and a ruthless thirst for power. He is extremely confident in himself and his abilities, and his charisma allows him to manipulate others easily. His motivation has always been power and wealth, and he is ready for a lot to achieve them. Fontaine saw in “delight” the perfect laboratory for his experiments and business projects. He became the ally of Dr. Sofia Lamb, who carried him away by the new philosophy of “altruism”, and together they began to conduct genetic experiments, creating plasmids and large dadies. Although it should be noted that confidence in the doctor were minimal. He knew that there can be only one tiger in the cage, and in “delight” only one Atlant.
Fontaine psychology changed as he deepens into the philosophy of Ryan. He became more cruel and ruthless, ready for sacrifices and sacrificing others for his goals. His desire for absolute power and control over the city led him to inhuman actions and manipulations.
Fontaine’s moral state is a complex and multifaceted aspect of his personality. On the one hand, he seems to be a businessman who strives for success and wealth, and in the world of Ryan, where his own laws act, moral norms are distorted. On the other hand, its methods, such as the operation of the working class and parasitization, the creation of large daddy and manipulations, are obvious moral disorders. Its fall into immorality and ruthlessness reflects how human values can change under the influence of power and ambitions. At the beginning of the game, its motivation can simply be the desire to enrich, but as the plot develops, it becomes more and more obsessed. Fontaine is a real reflection of Andrew Ryan, only idealized and elevated to the Absolute. Over time, Fontaine turns into real Atlanta, Titan, who more except his own vanity and the thirst for absolute control except his own vanity. Of course, Andrew Ryan does not cope with him, because Fontaine himself is himself, only in the world that he conceived and created. The results of this confrontation we admire with Jack when we find ourselves in the destroyed buildings of the once great city.
Results
In conclusion, I would like to note the importance of the above people, which to varying degrees influenced life and events in “delight”. We can fully call each of them to be guilty, but only they are involved in chaos, or in this every living soul is replaced? From this equation, I can immediately remove the little sisters, for only they are the same innocent and completely inexplicable group to events. Therefore, the game gives us a choice when we take them in our hands. But everyone else is still involved, someone is more, and someone is less. Andrew Ryan, Sofia Lamb, Frencu Fontaine, Jan Sushong, Sandur Cohen, the Bridget Tennenbaum and other “delight” were given strength and possibilities to change their state and condition of others, but they did not succeed in this. Therefore, they can be fully condemned, but also about the rest should not be forgotten, because they followed them, obeyed them, fought only for their ideas and survival, while rejecting everything else. The guilty can be sought for a long time, but it will not work to find it more likely, but it is still worth emphasizing some points. “Delight” is a city where there is almost everything: grace and vice, beauty and horror, ambition and fears, individualism and altruism, science and naivety, free market and control, kindness and hatred. “Delight” is a continuous contradiction ..